The GPU or graphics processing unit or graphics card is the component responsible for providing smooth and awe-inspiring visuals in video games. This comes at a cost, which is not only money but also electricity. As you can imagine, power-efficient graphics cards use less energy to provide you with jaw-dropping visuals.
Sure, it might feel godly to witness and experience triple-digit framerates at Ultra settings in the latest video games; but you’ll end up feeling like a pleb after seeing that electricity bill. And with the current state of the world right now, power-efficient graphics cards just might contribute to improving the situation.
RELATED: AMD vs Intel Processors In Gaming – Which One Outperforms The Other One
So in hindsight, power-efficient graphics cards not only alleviate your electricity worries but also help conserve energy. Any card that uses less energy also produces less heat, and thus less noise.
It’s a domino effect. Your room won’t get as hot; your A/C won’t have to work as hard, and you also won’t be pestered by fan sounds. Moreover, you won’t wear out the GPU as much, assuming they’re power-efficient graphics cards.
So before you decide on which graphics card to purchase, you might want to take a look at how they measure up in terms of efficiency. We’ll also be recommending which ones use the least amount of power for their performance.
1. AMD Radeon RX 6600
PROS
- Lowest TDP for mid-range cards
- Won't break the bank
- Lets you save money on PSU
- Doesn't get too hot or noisy
CONS
- Weak RTX performance
- Not great for future-proofing
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 132 watts
- MSRP: $329
- Memory Size: 8 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 300 watts
Even the most budget-oriented gamers will be pleased with this one. It’s more than decent for 1080p gaming, even at Ultra settings. The RX 6600 (not to be confused with the XT variant), even trades blows with Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060, which uses 160 watts of power.
So it’s a no-brainer if what you’re looking for is performance-per-watt. The best part is that you can pair it with a measly 300-watt PSU, which helps a lot in keeping the budget under control. It might be officially a mid-range card, but we recommend going for this one even if your budget is for low-end. It’s that good; forget about AMD and Nvidia’s low-end offerings.
2. AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
PROS
- Edges out the RTX 3060 from the competition
- Can run the latest games at Ultra in 1080p
- Some models run cheaper than the MSRP
CONS
- Only 8 GB of VRAM
- PSU requirement is a big jump from 300 watts
- Poor Raytracing performance
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 160 watts
- MSRP: $379
- Memory Size: 8 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 500 watts
If you want a little better future-proofing than what the plain RX 6600 offers, then the RX 6600 XT is its more robust bigger brother. It runs on 160 watts maximum, allowing users to gain more performance for just 50 more dollars or so, depending on the brand.
This will bump up the PSU requirement by quite a bit and will move your budget from low-end to mid-range, but it’s worth it if you plan on keeping the card for up to four years while gaming at 1080p. Against its equivalent, the RTX 3060, this is a better deal, unless you want Raytracing.
3. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PROS
- Somewhat overkill for 1080p gaming
- Solid 1440p performer (Ultra settings)
- Can handle Raytracing at Ultra (unless the game is Cyberpunk 2077)
- Best price-to-performance out of all the GPUs this generation
- Can easily match the RTX 3070 when overclocked
CONS
- Hard to find at MSRP due to demand (prices will be higher)
- Runs rather hot and noisy (for two-fan models)
- Only 8 GB of VRAM
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 200 watts
- MSRP: $399
- Memory Size: 8 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 600 watts
Considered by many as the best price-to-performance GPU in this current generation of computer hardware, the RTX 3060 Ti has wowed many gamers. Because it’s an overkill 1080p card, and a solid 1440p gaming card (though with a few compromises).
That very well means it’s the best of both worlds and also a good transitory GPU for those looking to upgrade from 1080p to 1440p. Ideally, it’s only a little more expensive compared to AMD’s RX 6600 XT or even Nvidia’s RTX 3060, so you’d be wise to grab this one instead. That is assuming you’re okay with the significant wattage bump and the higher PSU requirements.
4. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070
PROS
- Ideal 1440p card
- Only 20 watts more power-hungry than the 3060 Ti
- Mostly Beats AMD's competitive offerings (on the same price point)
- Good price-to-performance ratio
- Good Raytracing performance
CONS
- Hard to find at MSRP due to demand (prices will be higher)
- Runs hot and noisy (for two-fan models)
- Only 8 GB VRAM
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 220 watts
- MSRP: $499
- Memory Size: 8 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 650 watts
The reason why a lot of Nvidia fans only consider the RTX 3060 Ti to be an “entry-level” 1440p card is that the RTX 3070 will zoom past it on that resolution. But for 1080p, the two are quite close. Still, if you really want something more future-proof for 1440p, then the RTX 3070 is a more secure option.
It does cost $100 more than the RTX 3060 Ti, but the card makes up for it by only having a TDP that’s 20 watts higher. That means you don’t have to worry too much about your electricity bill when switching from 3060 Ti to 3070.
5. AMD Radeon RX 6800
PROS
- Best 1440p performance out of all the 1440p cards
- You can find them at MSRP
- Conservative power requirement and wattage for its performance
- 16 GB of VRAM makes it more future proof
CONS
- Not as good at Raytracing performance compared to Nvidia cards
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 250 watts
- MSRP: $579
- Memory Size: 16 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 650 watts
AMD does have an answer for Nvidia’s RTX 3060 Ti, and no, it’s not the RX 6700 XT, sadly. It’s the more expensive RX 6800 (not to be confused with the XT variant). This card is only 30 watts more power hungry than the Nvidia RTX 3070. What does seal the deal is its better performance.
Granted, the price is higher by about 80 dollars (when comparing MSRPs), but it’s a better deal nonetheless, especially if you want a more future-proof option for your 1440p monitor. Really, you can’t go wrong with the 3060 Ti, the 3070, and the RX 6800. But if you do want the best for just 1440p and your 650-watt PSU, then go for the Radeon RX 6800.
6. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PROS
- Decent for 4K gaming
- Overkill for 1440p gaming
- 16 GB of VRAM makes it more future proof
- You can find them at MSRP
CONS
- Runs hot and noisy, you'll need to invest in better cases or cooling
- Expect to allot a higher budget for other components
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 300 watts
- MSRP: $649
- Memory Size: 16 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 750 watts
With a significant TDP jump from the non-XT variant, the RX 6800 XT is quite a beast when it comes to 1440p, perhaps even overkill. It is advertised as a 4K card and on that front, it handles the segment well; though if you want a high framerate (anything above 60 FPS) at 4K, then there are more capable options.
Still, it’s a good card for when you want to try out some transitioning to 4K or want some budget 4K performance that still handles Ultra settings for the latest games. Forget about your mid-range PSU, however, this is the big leagues, and you will need a high-end PSU for this.
7. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
PROS
- Much better option for 4K
- 16 GB of VRAM makes it more future proof
- Trades blows with Nvidia's best offerings
- More manageable price compared to Nvidia's offerings at the same tier
CONS
- A bit hard to find at MSRP
- Runs hot and noisy, you'll need to invest in better cases or cooling
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 300 watts
- MSRP: $699
- Memory Size: 16 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 850 watts
As proof of just how efficient AMD’s architecture is for this generation, here’s the RX 6900 XT. It’s a tier higher than the RX 6800 XT, but get this; it draws the same amount of power. Oh, and it also only costs 50 dollars more due to sales (though its original MSRP used to be higher).
Really, at this generation, the only reason to grab the RX 6800 XT over this is if you already have a 750-watt PSU and you don’t want to spend another premium for an 850-watt PSU; that’s what this card needs, likely for power spikes. It’s a better 4K card, for that matter.
8. AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
PROS
- Maxed out 4K experience
- Top-of-the-line for AMD
- Only draws 335 watts (usually less in actual gaming)
- 16 GB of VRAM makes it more future proof
- Trades blows with Nvidia's best offerings
- More manageable price compared to Nvidia's offerings at the same tier
- You can find them at MSRP
CONS
- Runs hot and noisy, you'll need to invest in better cases or cooling
- Thermal Design Power (TDP): 335 watts
- MSRP: $1,099
- Memory Size: 16 GB
- Suggested Power Supply Unit (PSU): 850 watts
We’re still recommending AMD’s cards in this segment, which is 4K maxed out. Because Nvidia’s offerings in this segment are just too power-hungry. The RTX 3090 is rated for 350 watts (and performs a bit worse than the 6950 XT) while the RTX 3090 Ti consumes a whopping 450 to 480 watts.
Paired with all the other PC components, that’s like a microwave heating up the air sustained for several hours. So if you want to keep things under control for your neighborhood’s power grid while still aiming for a pleasant maxed-out 4K experience, AMD’s 6950 XT is the way to go.
Frequently Asked Questions
-
Is AMD more efficient than Nvidia?
In this current generation, yes. Some Nvidia cards did beat AMD in certain segments, but generally, AMD offers more performance per watt. -
Are power effiicent cards worth it for electricity bill savings?
That depends on where you live. If electricity costs are higher in your area compared to others, then you might see better savings by picking more efficient graphics cards.